Slow track and significant scrutiny draft determinations models

We use data models to calculate water companies’ price controls – and certain information we need to set those controls.

We published early draft determinations in April 2019 for Severn Trent Water, South West Water and United Utilities Water, which included the models we used for those companies.

Below we’ve set out the models we have used to set the slow track and significant scrutiny draft determinations for 2020 to 2025 for all remaining companies. These include:

  • past delivery models
  • cost assessment models
  • financial models
  • risk and return models
  • bioresources models
  • PR19 reconciliation models

We have updated our PR19 models map to help show how all the models work together.

Past delivery models

The purpose of the past delivery modelling suite is to perform the reconciliations of the 2014 price review incentive mechanisms operating for companies during 2015-20.

We will apply the reconciliation adjustments to companies’ 2020-25 price controls. We use the revenue and Regulatory Capital Value (RCV) adjustments produced by the reconciliation models as inputs for the PR19 financial model in the revenue adjustments feeder model and the RCV adjustments feeder model.

For each company we publish:

  • a model for each reconciliation
  • a revenue adjustments feeder model
  • a RCV adjustments feeder model

We also publish a service incentive mechanism (SIM) model for the industry.

Company

Outcome delivery incentives

Land disposals

Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism

Total Expenditure reconciliation

Water trading

Residential retail revenue

Regulatory capital value adjustment model

Revenue adjustments model

Service incentive mechanism

Affinity Water Outcome Delivery Incentives model – Affinity Water Land Disposals model – Affinity Water Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism model – Affinity Water Total Expenditure reconciliation model – Affinity Water Residential Retail Revenue model – Affinity Water Regulatory capital value adjustment model – Affinity Water Revenue adjustments model – Affinity Water
Anglian Water Outcome Delivery Incentives model – Anglian Water Land Disposals model – Anglian Water Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism model – Anglian Water Total Expenditure reconciliation model – Anglian Water Residential Retail Revenue model – Anglian Water Regulatory capital value adjustment model – Anglian Water Revenue adjustments model – Anglian Water
Bristol Water Outcome Delivery Incentives model – Bristol Water Land Disposals model – Bristol Water Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism model – Bristol Water Total Expenditure reconciliation model – Bristol Water Residential Retail Revenue model – Bristol Water Regulatory capital value adjustment model – Bristol Water Revenue adjustments model – Bristol Water
Hafren Dyfrdwy Outcome Delivery Incentives model – Hafren Dyfrdwy Land Disposals model – Hafren Dyfrdwy Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism model – Hafren Dyfrdwy Total Expenditure reconciliation model – Hafren Dyfrdwy Residential Retail Revenue model – Hafren Dyfrdwy Regulatory capital value adjustment model – Hafren Dyfrdwy Revenue adjustments model – Hafren Dyfrdwy
Northumbrian Water Outcome Delivery Incentives model – Northumbrian Water Land Disposals model – Northumbrian Water Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism model – Northumbrian Water Total Expenditure reconciliation model – Northumbrian Water Water Trading model – Northumbrian Water Residential Retail Revenue model – Northumbrian Water Regulatory capital value adjustment model – Northumbrian Water Revenue adjustments model – Northumbrian Water
Portsmouth Water Outcome Delivery Incentives model – Portsmouth Water Land Disposals model – Portsmouth Water Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism model – Portsmouth Water Total Expenditure reconciliation model – Portsmouth Water Water Trading model – Portsmouth Water Residential Retail Revenue model – Portsmouth Water Regulatory capital value adjustment model – Portsmouth Water Revenue adjustments model – Portsmouth Water
SES Water Outcome Delivery Incentives model – SES Water Land Disposals model – SES Water Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism model – SES Water Total Expenditure reconciliation model – SES Water Residential Retail Revenue model – SES Water Regulatory capital value adjustment model – SES Water Revenue adjustments model – SES Water
South East Water Outcome Delivery Incentives model – South East Water Land Disposals model – South East Water Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism model – South East Water Total Expenditure reconciliation model – South East Water Residential Retail Revenue model – South East Water Regulatory capital value adjustment model – South East Water Revenue adjustments model – South East Water
Southern Water Outcome Delivery Incentives model – Southern Water Land Disposals model – Southern Water Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism model – Southern Water Total Expenditure reconciliation model – Southern Water Residential Retail Revenue model – Southern Water Regulatory capital value adjustment model – Southern Water Revenue adjustments model – Southern Water
South Staffs Water Outcome Delivery Incentives model – South Staffs Water Land Disposals model – South Staffs Water Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism model – South Staffs Water Total Expenditure reconciliation model – South Staffs Water Residential Retail Revenue model – South Staffs Water Regulatory capital value adjustment model – South Staffs Water Revenue adjustments model – South Staffs Water
Thames Water Outcome Delivery Incentives model – Thames Water Land Disposals model – Thames Water Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism model – Thames Water Total Expenditure reconciliation model – Thames Water

 

Total Expenditure reconciliation model – Thames Tideway Tunnel

Water Trading model – Thames Water Residential Retail Revenue model – Thames Water Regulatory capital value adjustment model – Thames Water Revenue adjustments model – Thames Water

Revenue adjustments model – post profiling 1 – Thames Water

Revenue adjustments model – post profiling 2 – Thames Water

Revenue adjustments model – post profiling 3 – Thames Water

Revenue adjustments model – profiled adjustments aggregation – Thames Water

Dŵr Cymru Outcome Delivery Incentives model – Dŵr Cymru Land Disposals model – Dŵr Cymru Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism model – Dŵr Cymru Total Expenditure reconciliation model – Dŵr Cymru Residential Retail Revenue model – Dŵr Cymru Regulatory capital value adjustment model – Dŵr Cymru Revenue adjustments model – Dŵr Cymru
Wessex Water Outcome Delivery Incentives model – Wessex Water Land Disposals model – Wessex Water Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism model – Wessex Water Total Expenditure reconciliation model – Wessex Water Residential Retail Revenue model – Wessex Water Regulatory capital value adjustment model – Wessex Water Revenue adjustments model – Wessex Water
Yorkshire Water Outcome Delivery Incentives model – Yorkshire Water Land Disposals model – Yorkshire Water Wholesale Revenue Forecasting Incentive Mechanism model – Yorkshire Water Total Expenditure reconciliation model – Yorkshire Water Residential Retail Revenue model – Yorkshire Water Regulatory capital value adjustment model – Yorkshire Water Revenue adjustments model – Yorkshire Water
Industry SIM model

Cost assessment models

The aim of cost assessment modelling suite is to assess business plan costs and to set efficient totex allowances.

We have published the following models.

1) Enhancement feeder models: the enhancement feeder models include our assessment of enhancement costs.

2) Cost adjustment claims feeder models: these models include our assessment of companies’ cost adjustment claims. There is one model for each slow track/significant scrutiny company that submitted cost adjustment claims in its April 2019 business plan.

3) Separate controls: These models include our assessment of the costs we allow in separate wholesale controls for two companies, Thames Water and Portsmouth Water.

4) Unmodelled base costs feeder models: This is a suite of models that sets out our assessment and allowance for Abstraction charges, Business rates, Third party costs, Pension deficit recovery costs, Traffic management act costs, Other costs including third party services, Other cash items and industrial emissions directorate costs

5) Aggregator files: These are intermediary files and do not present assessment

6) Reallocations feeder model: this file provides information on how costs have been reallocated from one enhancement cost category to another enhancement cost category or to base costs.

7) Enhancement opex implicit allowance feeder model: this model estimates the enhancement opex that is already included efficient modelled base allowance.

8) Company specific efficiency challenge feeder model: this model is used to determine the company specific efficiency challenge that is used in the enhancement shallow dives and deep dive.

9) Opex lease adjustments model: this model calculates the adjustment to allowed operating expenditure to reflect operating leases which are reclassified as capital expenditure under new accounting regulations.

10) We have a suite of four models for wholesale water, wholesale wastewater and residential retail.

  • FM_RR1, FM_WW1 and FM_WWW1 are the master datasets including costs and costs drivers data provided by companies.
  • FM_RR2, FM_WW2 and FM_WWW2 calculate the catch-up efficiency challenge.
  • FM_RR3, FM_WW3 and FM_WWW3 calculate the forecast of costs drivers that are used in our econometric models to explain our modelled based costs.
  • FM_RR4, FM_WW4 and FM_WWW4 calculate efficient base costs and efficient totex per price control by adding the different building blocks of our totex assessment.

11) Business retail feeder model: this models calculates the efficient cost allowance for business retail

12) We also present the following workbooks which include costs drivers that are obtained from external sources:

  • Density indices forecast, historical and forecast: these models use local authority data on ONS population and density by local authority areas to construct company specific population density indicators.
  • Households forecasts: This model calculates the number of projected ONS households per each company as well as the annual growth rates for the AMP7 period.

13) We also present three Stata do files used to estimate the coefficients of our econometric models in the following areas.

  • Wholesale water
  • Wholesale wastewater
  • Residential retail

1. Enhancement feeder models

Water

Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Drinkingwater protection
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Ecological improvements
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Eels regulations
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Freeform
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Improvement to river flows
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Invasive species
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Investigations
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Lead standards
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Metering
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Raw water deterioration
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Resilience
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Supply demand balance
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Security
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Strategic regional
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Taste, odour, colour
Wholesale Water Enhancement feeder model: Water framework directive

Wastewater

Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Chemicals investigations
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Chemicals removal
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Conservation drivers
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Discharge relocation
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Eels regulations
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Event duration monitoring
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: First time sewerage
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Flow monitoring
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Flow to full schemes
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Freeform
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Groundwater schemes
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Investigations
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Monitoring flows at combined sewer over flow events
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: N-removal
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Odour
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: P-removal technology investigations
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: P-removal
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Resilience
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Sanitary parameters
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Security
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Sludge
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Spill frequency
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Storm tank capacity
Wholesale Wastewater Enhancement feeder model: Ultraviolet disinfection

2. Cost adjustment claims feeder models

Company

Cost adjustment claims feeder models

Affinity Water Cost adjustment claim feeder model AFW
Anglian Water Cost adjustment claim feeder model ANH
Bristol Water Cost adjustment claim feeder model BRL
Hafren Dyfrdwy Cost adjustment claim feeder model HDD
Northumbrian Water Cost adjustment claim feeder model NES
Portsmouth Water Cost adjustment claim feeder model PRT
SES Water Cost adjustment claim feeder model SES
South East Water Cost adjustment claim feeder model SEW
Southern Water Cost adjustment claim feeder model SRN
South Staffs Water Cost adjustment claim feeder model SSC
Thames Water Cost adjustment claim feeder model TMS
Dŵr Cymru Cost adjustment claim feeder model WSH
Wessex Water Cost adjustment claim feeder model WSX
Yorkshire Water Cost adjustment claim feeder model YKY

3. Separate controls

Cost adjustment claim feeder model Havant Thicket (PRT) separate control
Cost adjustment claim feeder model Thames Tideway separate control

4. Unmodelled base costs feeder models

Unmodelled costs feeder model: Abstraction
Unmodelled costs feeder model: Business Rates
Unmodelled costs feeder model: Other Costs
Unmodelled costs feeder model: Pension deficit repair costs
Unmodelled costs feeder model: Traffic management act

5. Aggregator files

Feeder model: Enhancement aggregator
Feeder model: Cost Adjustment Claims aggregator
Feeder model: Unmodelled costs aggregator

6. Reallocations feeder model

Feeder model: Enhancement Reallocations

7. Enhancement opex implicit allowance feeder model

Enhancement opex implicit allowance

8. Company specific efficiency challenge feeder model

Company efficiency factor

9. Opex lease adjustments

Opex lease adjustments

10. Wholesale water, wholesale wastewater and residential retail models

Wholesale water models

Feeder model 1: Wholesale water – Master data
Feeder model 2: Wholesale water – Water Catch up adjustment
Feeder model 3: Wholesale water: Forecast of water cost drivers
Feeder model 4: Wholesale water – Water resources and water N+ cost allowances

Wholesale wastewater models

Feeder model 1: Wholesale wastewater – Master data
Feeder model 2: Wholesale wastewater – Wastewater Catch up adjustment
Feeder model 3: Wholesale wastewater: Forecast of wastewater cost drivers
Feeder model 4: Wholesale wastewater – Bioresources and wastewater N+ cost allowances

Residential retail models

Feeder model 1: Retail – Master data
Feeder model 2: Retail – Catch up adjustment
Feeder model 3: Retail – Forecast of retail cost drivers
Feeder model 4: Retail cost allowances

11. Business retail feeder model

Feeder Model: Business Retail

12. Cost Driver workbooks

Household forecast ONS data
Weighted average density index – forecast
Weighted average density index – historical

13. Stata do files

Stata do files: Retail
Stata do files: Wholesale water
Stata do files: Wholesale wastewater

Financial models

The purpose of the financial modelling suite is to set price control limits for the 2019 price review and to test company financeability. It is also used to test return on Regulated Equity in different scenarios.

The suite consists of:

  • the main financial model
  • a grants and contributions model that calculates the grants and contributions for input to the financial model
  • the cost sharing model to calculate an ex ante allowance on costs and profile costs across the financial modelling period

We publish a financial model, a grants and contributions model and a cost sharing model for each company.

We also publish an inflation model for the industry.

Company

Financial models

Grants and contributions models

Cost sharing models

Inflation model

Affinity Water Financial model – Affinity Water Grants and Contributions model – Affinity Water Cost Sharing model – Affinity Water
Anglian Water Financial model – Anglian Water Grants and Contributions model – Anglian Water Cost Sharing model – Anglian Water
Bristol Water Financial model – Bristol Water Grants and Contributions model – Bristol Water Cost Sharing model – Bristol Water
Hafren Dyfrdwy Financial model – Hafren Dyfrdwy Grants and Contributions model – Hafren Dyfrdwy Cost Sharing model – Hafren Dyfrdwy
Northumbrian Water Financial model – Northumbrian Water Grants and Contributions model – Northumbrian Water Cost Sharing model – Northumbrian Water
Portsmouth Water Financial model – Portsmouth Water

Financial model – Portsmouth Water with Havant

Grants and Contributions model – Portsmouth Water Cost Sharing model – Portsmouth Water
SES Water Financial model – SES Water Grants and Contributions model – SES Water Cost Sharing model – SES Water
South East Water Financial model – South East Water Grants and Contributions model – South East Water Cost Sharing model – South East Water
Southern Water Financial model – Southern Water Grants and Contributions model – Southern Water Cost Sharing model – Southern Water
South Staffs Water Financial model – South Staffs Water Grants and Contributions model – South Staffs Water Cost Sharing model – South Staffs Water
Thames Water Financial model – Thames Water Grants and Contributions model – Thames Water Cost Sharing model – Thames Water
Dŵr Cymru Financial model – Dŵr Cymru Grants and Contributions model – Dŵr Cymru Cost Sharing model – Dŵr Cymru
Wessex Water Financial model – Wessex Water Grants and Contributions model – Wessex Water Cost Sharing model – Wessex Water
Yorkshire Water Financial model – Yorkshire Water Grants and Contributions model – Yorkshire Water Cost Sharing model – Yorkshire Water
Industry Inflation model

Risk and return models

Company

Pay as you go (PAYG) models

Affinity Water Pay as you go (PAYG) model – Affinity Water
Anglian Water Pay as you go (PAYG) model – Anglian Water
Bristol Water Pay as you go (PAYG) model – Bristol Water
Hafren Dyfrdwy Pay as you go (PAYG) model – Hafren Dyfrdwy
Northumbrian Water Pay as you go (PAYG) model – Northumbrian Water
Portsmouth Water Pay as you go (PAYG) model – Portsmouth Water
SES Water Pay as you go (PAYG) model – SES Water
South East Water Pay as you go (PAYG) model – South East Water
Southern Water Pay as you go (PAYG) model – Southern Water
South Staffs Water Pay as you go (PAYG) model – South Staffs Water
Thames Water Pay as you go (PAYG) model – Thames Water
Dŵr Cymru Pay as you go (PAYG) model – Dŵr Cymru
Wessex Water Pay as you go (PAYG) model – Wessex Water
Yorkshire Water Pay as you go (PAYG) model – Yorkshire Water

Bioresources models

We use the following spreadsheet models to calculate the bioresources revenue to remunerate fixed costs for companies.

The aim of those models is to illustrate the methodology we have used to classify companies’ revenues as either fixed or variable. The methodology ensures that where sludge production varies the incremental change in revenues that arises is aligned to incremental costs.

Getting the alignment between incremental revenues and incremental costs right is key to ensuring that the company is correctly remunerated, if there is a difference between the sludge companies actually produce and what they had forecast.

Company

Bioresources models

Anglian Water Bioresources revenue to remunerate fixed costs – Anglian Water
Dŵr Cymru Bioresources revenue to remunerate fixed costs – Dŵr Cymru
Northumbrian Water Bioresources revenue to remunerate fixed costs – Northumbrian Water
Southern Water Bioresources revenue to remunerate fixed costs – Southern Water
Thames Water Bioresources revenue to remunerate fixed costs – Thames Water
Wessex Water Bioresources revenue to remunerate fixed costs – Wessex Water
Yorkshire Water Bioresources revenue to remunerate fixed costs – Yorkshire Water

PR19 reconciliation models

We have published models (‘PR19 reconciliation models’) we will use when we next set price controls in 2024 for how we will take reconcile companies’ performance during 2020-25.